• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation

Official website of writer Aaron Johnston

  • HOME
  • PORTFOLIO
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT

Archives for August 2004

Church Ads. Isn’t It About Time?

August 23, 2004 By Aaron Johnston

I hate bad advertising.

Take last night, for example. I was driving home when I heard a sixty-second radio spot for a local plumbing company. During the spot, an announcer explains – rather excitedly I might add – that plumbers from this particular company don’t smell bad.

And that was it. For a whole sixty seconds, all the man talked about was how these plumbers don’t reek of bad odor.

Rather than talk about their service or prices or reliability, this plumbing company choose to put all their advertising eggs in the no-stinky-staff-members basket.

ANNOUNCER: So call Thompsom Plumbing. Because our plumbers don’t smell bad.

OK, did I miss something? Did I suddenly fall into a parallel universe, one in which plumbers are hired to NOT smell bad instead of being hired to fix the pipes?

I can see it now. I’m sitting in the living room with my wife.

“Golly, this house stinks,” I say. “The candles stink. The trash stinks. The dog stinks. Can’t we get some relief?”

My wife raises a finger, as if suddenly struck with inspiration. “I know,” she says. “What we need is something that does NOT stink.”

“By George you’re right,” I say, sitting up suddenly. “But whatever could that be?”

As an answer to our plea, the radio plays a particular commercial.

ANNOUNCER: So call Thompsom Plumbing. Because our plumbers don’t smell bad.

“Eureka!” I shout. “That’s the answer. Quick, honey, write down that number. ”

OK, I hate to burst your bubble, local plumbing company, but nobody cares that your plumbers all small of roses. Think about it. If the toilet explodes and water is spraying up to the ceiling, all I care about is that someone stops the water before the house floats away. He could be a rotten egg with hands for all I care. What’s important is that he fixes the leak.

Of course, what’s most appalling about this ad is that someone thought this was a good idea and paid real American dollars to produce it and play it on the radio.

Ouch.

The fact is, bad advertising is far more prevalent than good advertising. That’s why we as Latter-day Saints should thank our lucky stars that the church clearly understands how to advertise.

A few years ago, when a friend of mine found out I was Mormon, he immediately started singing.

“Mr. Robinson, I broke your window. Mr. Robinson, I broke your window.” And then finished the operatic performance singing, “I told the truthhhhhhhhhhhh.”

I had completely forgotten this spot, but as he explained it to me, it slowly came back to memory.

In the commercial, a little boy hits a baseball through the window of his aged neighbor, Mr. Robinson. The boy then must decide if he’s going to fess up to the deed or run away with hopes of never getting caught.

Well, of course he admits to doing it. But he does so in song.

The old man comes to the door and the little boy sings, “Mr. Robinson, I broke your window. Mr. Robinson, I broke your window.” And then when the relief of being honest washes over him, he sings triumphantly, “I told the truth.”

The spot ended with the announcer saying something about the importance of being honest.

I may be butchering the commercial, but that’s the gist of it.

And here was my friend, some fifteen years later, reciting the commercial as if he’d seen it on television only yesterday.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is every advertiser’s dream: long recall.

The church has been making public service announcements like this one for over thirty years. (Well, actually Bonneville Communications made the spots for the Church.) They’re all part of the Homefront campaign, the longest lasting, “most highly awarded PSA campaign series in broadcasting history” (Bonneville Communications website).

You hear that? The most awarded PSA campaign in history. In a word, church advertising rocks!

My favorite series of ads from the Homefront campaign end with the tagline: “Family. Isn’t it about time?” These are classics.

The best of the bunch is the one in which a little girl constantly asks her father to read to her a story. Remember this one? At the end of the spot the little girl creeps into her parents’ room while they’re sleeping.

“Daddy, can you read me a story?” she asks once again, in that adorable, not-pronounced-correctly way.

The father barely wakes up. “Go ask Mommy,” he manages to say.

The little girl then walks around the bed to Mom’s side and asks, “Mommy, can Daddy read me a story?”

OK, say it with me: Ahhhhhhhhh. Kids say the darndest things, don’t they?

It’s a cute spot. And I’m a sucker for cute.

Another classic spot was the one in which a gruff-looking factory working sings to his daughter over the telephone. He’s at work taking a break, and the little girl has apparently requested a rendition of “The Itsy Bitsy Spider.”

Fearful that his fellow workers might overhear him singing a children’s song and think him unmanly, the father begins singing quietly. Soon, however, he’s into the song and singing as loudly as he would if he were home. His daughter couldn’t be happier.

He then tells her he loves her and hangs up the phone.

Sure enough, a crowd of men have gathered. They tease him for his singing, but he shows no sign of shame.

“What can I say?” he says, smiling. “She’s my little girl.”

That, folks, is a great spot.

The true genius of these commercials, though, is that they’re all public service announcements. That means they get free air time. The church pays to distribute the spots, but not to play them. Television and radio stations do that for free.

And why for free? Well, firstly because TV and radio stations are required by law to play so many minutes of PSAs a month. Secondly, PSAs are for the public good. They teach lessons on morality and family values that benefit all of society.

That’s why I’m sad the church has made so few, if any, Homefront spots recently. The campaign has practically skidded to a halt. After thirty years of consistently good advertising, the church has slowed Homefront to a crawl.

There are several reasons for this, the economy being the most obvious. When money is tight, advertising budgets are often the first ones to go.

But another reason is that the church has placed a greater emphasis on the “call for a free copy” campaign. You know the one I’m talking about. In these spots, a toll-free number pops on screen and the announcer invites people to call in and get a free copy of the Book of Mormon or the Bible.

It’s a great campaign. The church has had tremendous success with it. Thousands of fellow Christians have been introduced to our beliefs through this effort.

But I sure do miss the Homefront ads. And so…

Dear Church Audio Visual Department,

My fellow Homefront fans and I are dying for some more commercials. Don’t leave us hanging. The campaign has been doing just fine for thirty years now, so let’s not spoil a good thing. Get out there and roll those cameras.

And while we’re waiting, put all the past Homefront ads on a DVD collection and sell it through church distributon. People would buy it. I know I would. The vignettes of cute kids and happy family moments are far more entertaining than most movies I see these days.

Respectfully yours,

Aaron Johnston

Come on, wouldn’t a DVD collection be cool? What could be more fun than gathering the family on a Sunday evening and watching the Homefront ads?

Goodness, now that I think about it, that’s a Homefront ad in and of itself, a family gathering to watch good commercials. It brings a tear to my eye.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: The Back Bench

Little People And Big Meetings

August 9, 2004 By Aaron Johnston

I’ve often heard stories of investigators visiting our church and being thunderstruck by all the noise from the congregation.

“Golly, you people are loud,” a friend of my wife’s once said. This was back in high school and she had invited him to a sacrament meeting.

“Loud?” she asked. “What do you mean?”

“All those babies crying. It was hard to concentrate on the speaker.”

My wife was very perplexed by this. As far as she was concerned, there weren’t any babies crying, not any more than usual anyway. And if there were a few noises here and there, she hadn’t found them disruptive.

What my wife didn’t know at the time was that she, like the rest of us, had developed an aural immunity to babies. She had become so accustomed to their occasional wails and whimpers that she didn’t even notice them anymore. Her mind filtered them out like static.

I didn’t fully realize this principle until I went to BYU and attended a single’s ward. I was shocked by how quiet it was. And I mean QUIET. No babies, no rattles, nothing. It was almost eery.

When the summer rolled around and I went back home to my family ward, I immediately noticed the noise. Babies crying, children sniffling, crayons scratching.

It was incredibly distracting. I had become so accustomed to the quieter version of sacrament meeting that my spoiled ears had a tough time readjusting.

No one’s to blame for this, of course. Not even the kids. Few children, I believe, are intentionally disruptive. They’re not trying to distract anyone. They’re just kids. They make noise. That’s what kids do. Especially the tiny ones; they can’t talk, so they cry.

This doesn’t mean, of course, that we parents shouldn’t make an effort to minimize the noise. In fact, we should do everything we can to keep them as quiet as possible.

I’ve seen several different strategies for doing this: books, puzzles, Cheerios, crayons and blank paper. I’ve even seen some parents simply hold their child. They don’t bring any amenities like those mentioned above, they just sit and, in theory, train the children to listen to the speaker.

Wow.

But whatever quieting tactic you implement, one fact remains: sooner or later that child is going to make noise. And when that happens, you have to decide, Can I quiet this child relatively quickly or do I need to take it out into the foyer or the cry room or wherever it is you prefer to take loud children?

Different parents have different philosophies. I’ve seen some parents rush their children out of a meeting at the slightest hint of a noise. And I’ve seen other parents keep their child in the meeting even when it’s obvious the child is distracting the rest of the congregation and making quite a scene.

My wife and I are currently trying to convince our twenty-month-old son that staying in sacrament meeting is far more enjoyable than going out. So, if he does make a lot of noise and needs to be taken out, we don’t let him run around. We hold him.

He hates that, especially if he sees that broad, empty gym floor while he’s in my arms. He looks at me as if to say, “Why are you holding me when there’s so much beautiful, polyurethaned flooring to run across? Let me down, weasel.”

I feel particularly bad because running and sliding through the gym always sounds like a good idea to me too.

So knowing when to take the child out is tricky indeed. Parents want to be courteous to others, but they also want to teach their children that sacrament meeting is where it’s at. Children are slow to believe this, however, and usually meet such thinking with resistance.

The Sacrament

I know of two philosophies concerning little children and the sacrament.

1. Children under the age of eight years old are not baptized members of the church and therefore do not and should not partake of the sacrament because it is an ordinance intended for those who have made baptismal covenants.

2. Allowing young children to participate in this ordinance teaches them to respect it and recognize it as a special event during our worship. Plus kids like imitating their parents. and it’s easier to let them partake of the sacrament than to explain to them why they can’t.

I learned recently that it’s a good idea for parents to agree on these philosophies. My wife, for example, leans toward the latter of the two. She gives our son the bread and water.

I lean toward the former since our little one usually spills the water on himself anyway and takes forever to drink it. Plus he’s not technically a member yet.

But since my wife is usually holding him during the passing of the sacrament, he’s always taken it. This past week, however, was different. My wife had to speak in sacrament meeting and was on the stand throughout the meeting. So the little guy sat in my lap.

When the bread tray came around, I took a piece for myself but, because of my opinion on the matter, didn’t give him one and handed back the tray.

This was a bad idea. My son, who clearly saw the tray and knew what it contained, became very upset that I would jilt him out of his bread.

He can’t talk yet, but it was obvious from his whining that he wanted to say, “Hey, what’s the big idea? Am I invisible here? It’s not like it’s caviar, Pop. Let me have my scrap of bread. Sheesh.”

It didn’t help matters that the priesthood lined up near our pew to return to the sacrament table and my son thought it still possible to reach out and get what he wanted. In fact, if I hadn’t restrained him, he might have jumped out of the pew and tackled the unsuspecting deacon.

I would have liked to have seen that, of course. Every father is proud to watch a son pull off a dangerous stunt. But since it was the chapel and since someone would have had to clean up the bread thrown from the tray during the assault and since that someone would likely have been me, I decided to I spare the deacon and took my son out before he could launch himself.

Needless to say that when the water tray came around to the foyer, my son got his very own cup.

It’s not easy being a parent. Knowing how to handle children during meetings is just one of those learn-as-you-go kind of lessons.

But whatever your philosophy, one thing is for certain: children belong in church. They bring light to our worship services, joy to our meetings.

I’m not ashamed to admit that my favorite sacrament meeting of the year is the primary program. That’s when doctrine is presented in its simplest and most direct form. That’s when the speakers are truly humble — and oftentimes, when the Spirit is the strongest.

It’s no wonder Christ invites us to be like little children. They’re innocent, pure, and full of the love of Christ. But I wonder, when Christ made his invitation, was he thinking only of quiet children? Or does he mean for us to be like children in all respects?

I can only assume he meant reverent children. Which is a shame, really, because I’d really like to slide across that gym floor in this suit.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: FEATURED, The Back Bench

Who’s It Gonna Be?

August 3, 2004 By Aaron Johnston

Put your hands together, brothers and sisters. It’s time once again to play your favorite after-church guessing game . . . Guess That Calling!

Cue cheesy game-show music.

And heeeeeeeeere’s your host.

Applause

HOST: Thank you, Mr. Announcer Voice. And welcome, everyone, to today’s show. Our three lovely contestants, Ted, Pam, and Gidgidonni, all have their buzzers ready, so let’s jump right in and begin round one. Ted, you’re our returning champion; why don’t you pick the first category?

TED: I’ll choose “Bishopric” for 200 please.

HOST: And the question is, “Brother Jones, the second counselor in the bishopric, announced today that he and his family are moving out of state. Who will the bishop call to take his place?”

BUZZ

HOST: Ted.

TED: Brother Williams?

HOST: Oh, good guess, Ted. Brother Williams is a spiritual guy, but the bishop will actually keep him as the high priest group leader.

BUZZ

HOST: Pam.

PAM: Brother McKenzie?

HOST: Oh, sorry, Pam. Brother McKenzie will stay as the ward financial clerk. Gidgidonni?

BUZZ

GIDGIDDONI: Sister Adams?

HOST: Uh . . . no, Sister Adams is a female, Gidgidonni. Only brethren can serve in the bishopric. The correct answer was Brother Clark, who no one thought of because he’s been teaching in the Primary for the past few years and no one notices him. OK, Ted, you still have possession.

TED: I’ll take “Young Men” for 300, please.

HOST: And the question is, “Brother Smith, the Young Men’s president, was just called to the stake High Council. Who will the bishop call to take his place?”

BUZZ

HOST: Pam.

PAM: That new guy in the ward?

HOST: Judges, can we accept “That new guy in the ward”?

BING!

HOST: That’s correct, Pam. And for your information, that new guy’s name is Brother Hilton. He and his wife just graduated from BYU. Aren’t they cute? OK, Pam you’ve got the board.

PAM: I’ll take “Stake Presidency” for 1,000, please.

HOST: And the question is…

BING! BING! BING!

HOST: Oh, it’s today’s Daily Double. Pam, how much of your earnings would you like to wager?

PAM: I only have 300 points.

HOST: All righty, then. I’ll take that to mean you’re putting it all on the line. The question is, “This November will be ten years since our stake presidency was called. In all likelihood, a new stake presidency will be sustained. Can you name at least two members of the new stake presidency?”

Tick Tock Tick Tock TIck Tock BING!

HOST: OK, Pam. What’s your answer?

PAM: Uh…I’m going to go with Bishop Peterson of the Second Ward and Brother Gregory from the High Council.

HOST: That’s correct! Good eye, Pam. That discernment could win you the game.

DONG!

HOST: Uh oh. That sound means we only have time for one more question. Pam?

PAM: “Mission Calls” for 400 please.

HOST: And the question is, “Brother and Sister Hanson just put in their mission call. Where will they be called to serve?”

BUZZ

HOST: Ted.

TED: South America?

HOST: Oh, sorry, Ted. Brother Hanson has a weak stomach. He specifically requested a no-bean-eating mission. South America is incorrect.

BUZZ

HOST: Gidgidonni.

GIDGIDDONI: The Relief Society?

HOST: Um…I don’t know how to respond to that except to say “Incorrect.”

BUZZ

HOST: Pam.

PAM: Historic Nauvoo?

HOST: Yes, that’s correct! And that means you, Pam, are our new champion.

Cue cheesy music and applause.

OK, did I get carried away here? Probably, but if you’re like me, you play this game all the time. A family announces that they’re moving, and immediately you begin to wonder who will be called to fill their vacancies.

This happens most frequently with the changing of the guard. Say for example the bishop has been serving in that capacity for a full five years now and next week is ward conference. What’s the first thought in everyone’s mind?

Yep. The bishop will be released.

And what’s the second thought in everyone’s mind?

That’s right. Who will be the new bishop?

Everybody speculates. Everyone’s got their theories.

My wife and I are already betting on our next bishop, and our current one still has eight months to go. It’s not that we don’t like our current bishop. It’s not that we’re eager to see him go. He’s a great guy. We just love playing the guessing game.

Turns out we both have our chips on the same guy. We’ll see.

And what’s my point? Am I saying that we shouldn’t do this? Do I think it’s bad to guess ahead? No. Personally I think it’s kind of fun. Whenever I guess right I can’t help but feel “in tune.”

Because the decision is the Lord’s. All callings are made by direct revelation. The speculations of ward members won’t change the decision one iota.

Which is great. Because it discourages us from seeking callings. We don’t study to be the bishop. We don’t vie for position in the Primary presidency. They come directly from the Lord. I know of no other religious organization that does this.

I’m not faulting ministers of other faiths, of course. It’s wonderful that they dedicate their lives to the Lord. My wife’s uncle is a Presbyterian minister, and if you met him you’d agree that he’s a humble, devout man of God. I have nothing but respect for him and others like him.

But in the LDS church we do things a little differently. We don’t wake up one day and decide, “You know, I’m gonna be a bishop in the Mormon church.”

In fact, the only sure-fire way to NEVER be called bishop — or Relief Society President for that matter — is to WANT the calling. If you’re power hungry, the Lord knows that. And he’ll take humility over ability any old day. Count on it.

I remember an incident on my mission that my mission president told me about. In an interview, one of the missionaries asked him, “So, President, when are you going to make me your assistant?”

You can probably guess what the mission president’s response was.

So seeking after callings won’t win you any points or land you any positions. And that’s why it’s fun to speculate about filling vacancies. We make our guesses based on character instead of trying to determine who works hardest to impress the bishop.

And because our leaders work by direct revelation, we can be sure the right person is called.

I love it when a calling surprises me. “Oh wow. That guy? Yeah, he’s awesome. He’s perfect. I never would have thought of him, but he’s perfect.”

You’ve no doubt heard many similar stories in General Conference. In every story a general authority goes to a stake to call a new patriarch or something and he does all these interviews, but he just can’t find the right guy. So he goes home and prays and the next morning he goes to the meeting and in walks this little old man who no one notices and no one thought would amount to much and the general authority says, “That’s our guy.”

I love these stories. They’re proof that revelation works.

I can’t imagine how difficult a decision it must be to fill a vacancy in the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. The prophet has to understand the Lord’s will completely.

Because unlike the bishop of a ward, who has a very limited pool of people to choose from, the prophet can call any member of the church throughout the world.

It’s unlikely, of course, that the Lord will choose someone who hasn’t had some experience in church government, but the possibility exists.

Consider President Howard W. Hunter. When he was called to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles he was serving as a stake president in California. He wasn’t a seventy. He wasn’t an area authority. He was a stake president. Wow. President David O. McKay, who called him, must have clearly understood the principle of revelation.

I’ll admit that I’ve already speculated on who will be called to fill the current vacancies in the Quorum of the Twelve. But I won’t share my theories here. Suffice it to say that whomever the Lord calls will be wonderful, capable men. Of that I am sure.

And I don’t think our speculation on the subject is at all disrespectful of the deceased. In that regard I think we should grieve for the departed, pray for comfort for their families, thank the Lord for their examples and service, and then look to the future.

We don’t forget them. We hold their words close to our heart. But we do so with our chins up and faces forward.

And to respect other men’s honor and character and to hope to be led by them is, in my opinion, not offensive to the Lord.

So be it apostle or bishop or young women’s president, I say speculating on who will be called is harmless meditation. Just keep in mind whose decision it will be. And while we wait, let’s thank the Lord for knowing all men and women far better than we ever can.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: FEATURED, The Back Bench

Copyright © 2025 Aaron Johnston

 

Loading Comments...